Apparently Melbourne, my dear old home town, is not full yet. Technically, of course, this is true. Australia is big, and there are coastal waters from which land could be reclaimed. If Melbourne grows to fill the continent and its continental shelf, we could always annexe New Zealand, or Antarctica.
When I read phrases like “the state economy’s heavy reliance on population growth,” I want to tear my hair out. Or rather, I want to tear out the hair of whoever is responsible for allowing said reliance to evolve. Because population can’t keep growing indefinitely, unless we figure out a way to make ourselves infinitely small.
An amoeba could grasp this concept with one of its pseudopods, and therefore I believe our leaders can grasp it with their pseudopods too. They just don’t give a fuck, since matters aren’t likely to come to a head before the next election. (Or maybe they do see a problem looming near to their own interests, but can’t find anyone to tell them how to wean an economy off an 84% reliance on population growth? And if neither side of the Labor-Liberal Party can find a solution that the electorate won’t vomit back in their faces, it becomes a political non-issue and therefore an actual non-issue, except for the people living in Oort Cloud Meadows with a $500,000 population-bloat-era mortgage — I’ll leave the “apartments or townhouses might be better for many of us” rant for another time — and without a doctor or a kindergarten or a bus.)
Bangkok has an official population of around 9 million. Estimates of the unofficial population vary, but supposing there are no more than 12 million people here at any one time — well, it’s still a lot. And it feels like a lot, especially when the traffic’s moving at 3 feet an hour. So my question to our elected microorganisms would be, How big is big enough, and do you have any plans for when we get there?
And their answer will be Squish, squish, squish. We will all become amoebas and squish. Or spread, puddle-like. More likely we will spread, this having been our tendency before we became amoebas.
Which brings me to how we distribute ourselves. Melbourne has a population of 4 million and its greater metropolitan region covers an area slightly larger than Bangkok’s. If everyone here lived in Australian-sized houses instead of apartments the size of an Australian walk-in robe, Bangkok’s outer suburbs would be in Burma. Unless business decentralises, you get a daily commute from hell (to hell, via hell.)
Again, a downgrade from human to amoebic life would ease pressure on infrastructure as well as housing prices. Amoebas don’t need public transport, or hospitals, or schools or shops or bars or cinemas or any of the other facilities that people in Melbourne’s vast suburbs might like to have. Of course, on the downside for the roads lobby, amoebas don’t drive cars, either. This could be a problem. How shall we perpetuate a car culture and keep covering the land in freeways if we can all get around by extending a pseudopod?
One more item occurs to me: water. Lack thereof is not a problem in Bangkok, which is sinking like Venice. It is a problem in Melbourne. Australia is prone to extended droughts. As in, droughts that go on for years and years and leave the land parched and livestock dead and trees dead and rivers dead and gardens dead. Only golf courses and football fields survive. We mustn’t let ourselves be lulled by the occasional damp interludes — or floods. There’s a limit to how many people our old, dry, delicate land can support, and I suspect it’s a low number. Last I heard, they were building a desalination plant at enormous taxpayer cost. Okay, maybe that will solve the problem of Melbourne sucking up the state’s water. But economic strategies designed around a stable population might, just might, have been a better idea. Then we wouldn’t have needed all the extra tax money from the extra people to pay for the desalination plant and the extra freeways and whatnot. See how it works?
Or, in lieu of responsible planning, and instead of turning into amoebas, we could turn into water bears, aka moss piglets — tardigrades, to give them their proper name. Although as their nickname suggests these little (0.1-1.5 mm) organisms dwell in water, when there’s no water they are able to dry out and survive in a dormant state for nearly ten years. They can also survive being heated to 151 °C (handy in a bushfire), and can withstand 500-1000 times more gamma radiation than a human (handy in a nuclear war). As a bonus, they can survive in the vacuum of space for a few days, too (handy should they need to leave Earth and colonise the Moon.)
The cute little tardigrade, whose toughness makes your average survivalist look like a North Carlton* latte drinker:


(from the “amazing closeups” below)
Are we just going to keep on turning farm land and bush into Melbourne? Are we going to keep on doing nothing to improve state and metropolitan railways? (Nota bene, fiddling around with new ticketing systems every few years is not improvement as such.) Are we going to keep adding to the city’s population without interest in that population’s quality of life or long-term viability?
Squish, squish?
I know things are worse in pretty much the rest of the whole world. I’m just not a big fan of shitting on your own chocolate cake. So sign me up for conversion. I’m going to be a tardigrade.
(*Melbourne has many beautiful Victorian houses like these. Of course, you have to be as rich as Croesus to obtain one for yourself. In fact, it’s getting to be that you have to be as rich as Croesus to buy a corner of a bungalow in Broady.)
More water bears:
Amazing closeups
A tardigrade at home
A tardigrade charging
Doing aerobics
To cuddle and wear